Hello Toni Mueller, Am 2010-12-08 19:06:43, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > I tried the high MX for some time, but in my experience, spammers > usually only hit the first two MXes.
I do not have this experience.
> So if you were using the high and
> low MX, you should imho have no reasonable benefit, because the
> second-lowest MX would be real, thus buying you no relief, and the
> third (or higher) MX will only get little traffic, thus also not
> contributing much to your relief.
I use byside the normal mail server two MX and where the latest was not
existant. Then I become courious whats cominginto the last MX and have
setup a Mailserver only to catch it...
Gotten a 1/2 mio spams per day without a singel false-positive.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
itsyst...@tdnet France EURL itsyst...@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack
Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.can4linux.org/>
Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ #328449886
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
