On 12/24, John Hardin wrote: > If there was some way to capture the score of RBL tests separately > from non-RBL tests and use them in place of the current RBL results > I might agree you have a point; but if the mass checks ignore the > scores that the current ruleset generates against historical mails, > then _what is the point to mass checks in the first place_?
Checking the results of the current ruleset against current emails? -- "...this thing we call 'failure' is not the falling down, but the staying down." - Mary Pickford http://www.ChaosReigns.com
