On 12/27/10 4:07 PM, "David F. Skoll" <d...@roaringpenguin.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:36:39 -0800 > Ted Mittelstaedt <t...@ipinc.net> wrote: > >> The real question is, do you get viruses that would make it past SA? > > I can't answer that because we scan for viruses before SA. I would > guess yes. It would be more efficient to scan for viruses after > scanning for spam, even though we still do it the other way around. I scan for viruses first, (actually second, after grey-listing) because clamav with the unofficial signatures identifies a fair amount of spam, and the non-virus findings are added to the spamassassin score... -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281
