At 06:29 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote: >On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote: > >> At 04:23 PM 1.2.2011 -0600, Dave Funk wrote: >>> On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Jack L. Stone wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry to have to return to the trough so soon, but still dealing with >>>> issues since recent upgrade of SA. Downgraded but no help there either, so >>>> went back to latest version. >>>> >>>> Am using FBSD-7.x with Sendmail and SA-3.3.1_3 >>>> >>>> Here is the SA headers in an email tagged as spam but got through anyway: >>>> X-Spam-Flag: YES >>>> X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/1.15.388 (mail.sagedata.net [38.106.15.121]); >>>> Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:42:43 -0600 >>>> X-Spam-Status: YES, hits=11.50 required=4.50 >>>> X-Spam-Level: xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (11.5 points, 4.5 required) >>>> >>>> Additionally, in my "local.cf" file I have tried to manage the "X-Spam" >>>> headers to exclude the X-Spam_Level, but it's still there contrary to the >>>> config: >>>> X-Spam-Level: xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> First I tried the "remove_header spam Level" and didn't change a thing. So, >>>> then went to the extreme and started with the "clear_headers" config with >>>> add-backs of only those I wanted. Still no joy. > >[snip..] > >> >> Hi, Dave. >> >> No, the "milter-spamc" doesn't change the header in this case. I had >> checked on that before. It can tag the subject only and I have that turned >> off. >> >> Jack > >Not sure exactly what header you're refering to when you say >'"milter-spamc" doesn't change the header in this case'. I thought you >were talking about the "X-Spam-Level" header which milter-spamc -does- >insert. See the first part of the page: >http://www.snertsoft.com/sendmail/milter-spamc/ > >Please note that milter-spamc may examine the results stream from SA, >pull out any "X-Spam-Level" contents, and pass that on to sendmail or it >may chose to fabricate a "X-Spam-Level" header based upon some criteria >and ignore any X-Spam-Level header that may or may not have been passed >back from SA. In either case the milter must take explicit actions for >a given header to be added to the message. > >Having done milter hacking I'm familiar with both of these processes >as well as other fun things that milters can do. ;) > >-- >Dave Funk University of Iowa
Dave: Ouch! Right you are about the insertions shown at the top of that page. My milter-spamc.cf file only contains the "options" which are managed by a "-option" or "+option". Since you have hacked it, is there any way to turn off the X-Spam-Level in milter-spamc? Jack (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american
