Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> wrote: > On 3.1.2011 20:13, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: >> Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> wrote: >>> On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote: >>>> >>>> I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while >>>> now. Works great. >>>> >>> >>> Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen. >> >> As I understand "limit of free queries" is sufficient for your server, >> is not it? >> > > I don't know what you mean... > > The actual purpose of my server is it provide service to a dropped, > earlier domain of ours, it transfers all email to the new domain. > x...@olddomain -> x...@newdomain. > > The old domain collects much spam, and it is not what we use daily. But > still the old domain must be served. > > I have implemented greylisting to the old domain now, as well. Not for > the new domain, but old. Just trying to get rid of the spam of the old > domain...
See point 3 below: http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/dnsblusage.html <quote> Use of the Spamhaus DNSBLs via DNS queries to our public DNSBL servers is free of charge if you meet all three of the following criteria: 1) Your use of the Spamhaus DNSBLs is non-commercial*, and 2) Your email traffic is less than 100,000 SMTP connections per day, and 3) Your DNSBL query volume is less than 300,000 queries per day. </quote> -- [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu [It is] best to confuse only one issue at a time. -- K&R