Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 3.1.2011 20:13, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi> wrote:
>>> On 3.1.2011 18:33, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been using zen.spamhaus.org as an MTA blacklist for quite a while
>>>> now.  Works great.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Many have said this. Thanks to all who replied, I have settled to zen.
>> 
>> As I understand "limit of free queries" is sufficient for your server,
>> is not it?
>> 
>
> I don't know what you mean...
>
> The actual purpose of my server is it provide service to a dropped,
> earlier domain of ours, it transfers all email to the new domain.
> x...@olddomain -> x...@newdomain.
>
> The old domain collects much spam, and it is not what we use daily. But
> still the old domain must be served.
>
> I have implemented greylisting to the old domain now, as well. Not for
> the new domain, but old. Just trying to get rid of the spam of the old
> domain...

See point 3 below:

http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/dnsblusage.html
<quote>
  Use of the Spamhaus DNSBLs via DNS queries to our public DNSBL servers
  is free of charge if you meet all three of the following criteria:
  1) Your use of the Spamhaus DNSBLs is non-commercial*,
    and
  2) Your email traffic is less than 100,000 SMTP connections
    per day, and
  3) Your DNSBL query volume is less than 300,000 queries
    per day.
</quote>

-- 
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
[It is] best to confuse only one issue at a time.
  -- K&R

Reply via email to