On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:43:16 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> On 14.01.11 23:19, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> meta SPF_NICE_PASS (SPF_HELO_PASS && SPF_PASS) > > I don't see any benefit of this rule, do you? it only hits ham here, never spam, so wanted to know if that same in public corpus, in my own testing its usefull with ham since most spammers can get SPF_PASS and not much spam have SPF_HELO_PASS at the same time
