On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:43:55 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote: > oh, and to be safe: > > reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.2, > reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1,2, > reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1,2,
Sound advice to advocate good practices, but in more recent version of Postfix, this should not be required. Wietse cleaned up the reject_rhsbl code to hopefully avoid these false positives. > or it might reject: mail from: <idiot@23.45.67.5> That should be rejected even before the RHSBL checks with: 501 5.1.7 Bad sender address syntax > (127.255.255.255 is returned if you pass it an ip address) 127.0.1.255 is returned for IP queries to the SpamHaus DBL. > withing seconds of putting on a 2000 user box, got hits. (just using > _sender) looked up the sender's name and found 27 spams sent today > that SA had to deal with (no more!) Glad to hear it's working well for you - I'm having a similar experience! -- Sahil Tandon <sa...@freebsd.org>
