On 2/2/2011 7:45 AM, John Levine wrote:
RFC Ignorant is deep into kook territory, as should be apparent if you
look at which RFCs they expect people to follow, and what their
definition of "follow" is.
abuse.net has been listed for years, since there is an autoresponder
on ab...@abuse.net, and I've never noticed any delivery problems.
One time I asked if they'd delist me if I got rid of the autoresponder
and just threw all the abuse mail away. Yes. QED.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
We finally agreed that rfc-ignorant.org is useless, or slightly more
harmful than good. Spamassassin will be disabling these rules by
default sometime soon.
http://www.spamtips.org/2011/01/disable-rfc-ignorantorg-rules.html
You can disable these rules with this config and avoid a useless DNS
query on every mail scan.
Warren
