All you had to do is add these lines to a cf file?
urirhssub URIBL_BLACK multi.uribl.com. A 2
body URIBL_BLACK eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_BLACK')
describe URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
tflags URIBL_BLACK net
score URIBL_BLACK 3.0
urirhssub URIBL_GREY multi.uribl.com. A 4
body URIBL_GREY eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_GREY')
describe URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist
tflags URIBL_GREY net
score URIBL_GREY 0.25
RGB Camera wrote:
>
> I can't comment about the particular URIs mentioned in this
> discussion, but we do run some URI rules that are redundant with URIBL
> listings.
>
> The reason we do this is because URIBL listings will sometimes
> time-out and be removed. So we will list some domain names in our
> rules in case they are dropped by URIBL et al later.
>
>
>
> On 3/2/2011 8:49 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>
>> Point being, this domain and likely most (if not all) others in the list
>> you're basing off, are listed in URI DNSBLs. This particular one is
>> listed in URIBL and SURBL JP and PH. With network test enabled, SA will
>> score them high already.
>>
>> So what is the point in this static, and likely huge, list of uri rules?
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/new-rules---where-do-i-activate-them--tp31008400p31053506.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
