On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 11:08 -1000, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> On 3/23/2011 10:58 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Ugh, nasty boy. ;) You do realize they wouldn't be hammering the SEM
> > DNS servers, if testrules wouldn't have slipped out accidentally -- by
> > sa-update.
> >
> > Personally, I'd much rather prefer to have this resolved by another
> > manual rule update, so the queries should die down within another 24-48
> > hours. Obviously, these sites do use sa-update...
> >
> > Thanks and props to Blaine, for effectively disabling the limit
> > temporarily, and sustain the load for a while! :)
>
> Agreed that would be the ideal solution. Who knows the procedure? Is
> that procedure documented?
Not as much as I would like it to be, but this is documented. See some
of my posts to dev@ the last days...
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
