Pasi Hirvonen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > I just recently moved our mail setup to new hardware and I've been > paying close attention to what gets marked as spam and what > doesn't. > > Looking at my spam folder, I have received roughly 550 spam emails > to my email account since last tuesday (15th). Out of those 550, > *345* have been downscored by RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED. Annoyingly, a > significant number of those spam mails have dropped just below the > spam threshold because of it. > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=6.105 required=6.31 > tests=[CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, DOS_HIGHBIT_HDRS_BODY=1, > HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, PYZOR_CHECK=1.985, > RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.246, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=6.076 required=6.31 > tests=[FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=2.785, FROM_MISSP_MSFT=1, > MISSING_HEADERS=1.207, > MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, > MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE=3.373, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, > T_FROM_MISSPACED=0.01] autolearn=no > > I'm thinking of not bothering with DNSWL tests anymore unless > someone convinces me this is a temporary hiccup. What are your > experiences? > > - Pasi > > ps. if someone wants to see full mail examples, I have plenty. :)
Would you like to report the spam to dnswl.org? http://www.dnswl.org/registerreporter.pl I receive a lot of spams from DNSWL_NONE (mainly yahoo), but spams from higher trust levels are quite rare. P.S. I report received spam to spamcop.net and dnswl.org (among others) using "semi automatic" scripts. -- [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu When a lion meets another with a louder roar, the first lion thinks the last a bore. -- G. B. Shaw
