Please keep the thread on-list. Do reply to the list, rather than to
individuals.
On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 01:32 +0530, shiva prasad wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
> Thanks for the reply.I am using a Propriety router
> with its own handlers and hooks that uses Spamassasin in turn with
> default spamassasins configuration options.Any mail that i
> send/receive through the router gets checked for spam.
>
> I am sending a mail with no body but only subject(normal plain text
> like hi or hello with no traces of SPAM content) which is being
> treated as SPAM.It this is not the default behavior,I can attribute it
> to the router code thats causing this false positive case to be
> treated as SPAM when it is plain mail with no body in it but only
> Subject
I see. However, we only can help you, if you have access to the box and
can control / tune the SA installation. If you cannot do this, you
should contact the vendor's support for the device.
Moreover, we can't help or suggest configuration changes, without a
sample as requested previously. At the very least the SA headers,
showing the reason why the box considers the messages to be spam.
As-is, outgoing mail FP'ing, can have a lot of reasons. Merely an empty
body is unlikely to cause it all by itself, though probably just pushed
the score over the threshold, combined with other tests hitting, too.
[ full-quote below snipped ]
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
