Mark Martinec wrote: > Per, > >> Splitting hairs... > > No problem. > >> queueing is an implementation of a design, and almost >> certainly what amavisd does :-) > > Surprise ... it doesn't. Queueing is left entirely in hands of an > MTA, and if using a pre-queue setup such as a smtp proxy as offered by > Postfix (or a milter setup) there is no additional queuing besides > what an MTA already does. > > Most importantly: a message is not processed one recipient at at time, > but as one entity, with one call to SpamAssassin, and then carefully > adjusting final message editing if settings of mail's recipients > require different final touches. It practically makes not difference > in timing if a message has one or a thousand recipients.
Interesting, thanks for enlightening me. I guess amavisd is just being opportunistic about it and hoping not many recipients will have individual settings? /Per Jessen, Zürich
