On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:16 -0700, Adam Katz wrote:

> On 06/22/2011 05:42 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> > Resurrecting an old thread but....
> > Lately I see a lot of false hits on   FSL_RU_URL
> > The only place in the email where .ru is, is in envelope-from ,  from,
> > and the received headers, this is supposed to be
> > from   72_active.cf:uri    FSL_RU_URL      /[^\/]+\.ru(?:$|\/|\?)/i
> > 
> > (those also on the c-nsp list may also be seeing the same?)
> > This only started recently.
> 
> Full rule, originating from rulesrc/sandbox/maddoc/99_fsl_testing.cf
> 
> uri      FSL_RU_URL      /[^\/]+\.ru(?:$|\/|\?)/i
> tflags   FSL_RU_URL      nopublish
> score    FSL_RU_URL      0.01
> 
> I see several problems here.
> 
> Chiefly, it's marked "nopublish" but is in some(?) copies of
> 72_active.cf (not trunk, and the rule is completely absent from the
> current 3.3 and 3.2 svn branches) ... is this out of sync?  IIRC, we
> fixed this problem a while ago, so perhaps Noel's system isn't properly
> using sa-update, it hasn't propagated yet, or he's doing something fishy.
> 


Hrmm sa-update reports no new updates, last touch date was march 25

Jun 24 10:21:24.410 [30018] dbg: dns: 1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org =>
1083704, parsed as 1083704
Jun 24 10:21:24.410 [30018] dbg: channel: current version is 1083704,
new version is 1083704, skipping channel

Nothing new to give me....
I've seen Warren's post about 3.3.2, so I'll be upgrading when our CPAN
mirror offers it it.
I've amended its score for time being to be very low so it cant wrongly
influence.



> As Ned answered, we need more information.  Specifically, tell us about
> your setup; what version (and package) of SpamAssassin are you using,
> tell us about your sa-update configuration, any hacks, etc.
> 


I use current versions from CPAN, I do not use distro supplied versions
of any key daemon, even though slackware
is pretty current in most of them, it often isn't build the way i need
(eg: mysql etc)

This occurs on each server, but i duplicate things so if one's wrong,
the lot would be, I run it in a nightly cron as: 
/usr/bin/sa-update
--channelfile /etc/mail/spamassassin/SAU-channel-list.txt   (2 X gpg
keys options removed)

The /etc/mail/spamassassin/SAU-channel-list.txt file contains in this
order:
updates.spamassassin.org
sought.rules.yerp.org
99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net

Nothing too fancy as you see, although we do have a few local rules
files, none of them have FSL in it.

Whilst we on that, I do have a few from years gone by, do you know off
hand if these are no longer needed
postcards.cf rateware.cf 70_tt_drugs.cf 99_anonwhois.cf, the others I
use give us hits, but its rare that those
do.


> Since FSL_RU_URL is so broad that it will match any link to any .ru
> domain, we don't really need to see an example (unless you're confident
> you have an example which lacks an actual .ru link ... this is a bug if
> that's triggering on one of the headers you're mentioning).
> 

That's what prompted me to ask, it is very broad.


Cheers
Noel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to