On 07/21, Michael Scheidell wrote:
but, this rule seems to be way too aggressive.
50_scores.cf:score FS_REPLICA 1.630 3.599 2.028 3.599 # n=2
50_scores.cf:score FS_REPLICAWATCH 3.237 1.715 1.733 3.015 # n=2
72_active.cf:header FS_REPLICA Subject =~ /replica/i
72_active.cf:describe FS_REPLICAWATCH Subject says Replica watch
On 21.07.11 16:07, [email protected] wrote:
SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
7.5986 0 1.000 0.92 3.24 FS_REPLICAWATCH
9.8513 0.0143 0.999 0.92 1.63 FS_REPLICA
[...]
But yes, it does look like this pair of rules could be improved. It is an
unfortunate problem that score generation doesn't have a good way of
accounting for heavy overlap.
That's why we need 1+1!=2 checking.
This is not the first time some rules overlap.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
It's now safe to throw off your computer.
