On 8/25/11 4:46 AM, Lars Jørgensen wrote:
Hi people,
I know that top quoting is bad form, but being forced to use Outlook
at the office, it's sometimes the only option when replying to
formatted mail. Like this.
And I do prefer top-quoting to the mess below, where I have no idea
who is writing what. Maybe I'm just grumpy and low on coffee, but I
hope list submitters will be a little more considerate legibility-wise
in the future.
strange as I don't use any ms stuff, and have no idea why your mail
reader is broken.
maybe you should check to see why it is?
i just checked the headers on the email I sent back, its a normal,
legit, 'multipart alternative' where PROPERLY formatted plain
text/flowed email is on top, and second multi-part is html.
first part has the customary > or >> prefix's to indicate levels of
reply inclusion, html part has correct <tags> to that any modern mail
reader can read it.
oh, ps, ms outlook CAN allow you to bottom post.
you just have to move the mouse down below before you post.
(or so I have been told)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNORT Integrator
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
