> pardon me for my ignorance, yet if you think about it, the OP's idea is why > some royalty had food and drink tester / tasters centuries ago > > assume all food and drink is poisoned > > problem is, if the poison wasnt fast acting, the royalty would ingest it and > die anyways.
with your logic.... why do you have door locks in your house? if you do not assume all others can get in your house, why do you use them? leave doors open as you are the only who will ever get into ! leave doors open as other people are "essentially say "neutral" until proven otherwise" > not or negating theory in math and other methodologies is really only there > to come up with alternative reasoning for solutions Good example but bad knowledge about maths. They are NOT there only to come up with alternative reasoning solutions. They are there to give the SAME solution with less effort !
