On 12/13/11 7:44 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Blocking seems to be the only thing that really achieves the goal they want beyond conversion to paying customers which is not SA's issue.

I agree with Kevin.
A while back, I published an 'example' blocking list, 'blocked.secnap.net' (wildcard entry for ipv4 :-). Guess what? it was added to a couple of perl dnsbl modules and used by people who never looked at what it was!

Two things happened:
#1, lots of (hundreds of thousands of queries per day) from one or two unnamed large ISP's #2, calls from 'internet lawyers' demanding that we remove them from the list. (we emailed them the bind zone and told them to identify their ip address and we would gladly remove it).

Also, emailing or calling 'abusers' doesn't work.
Kevin and I both run two of three sa-update mirror servers, and we have seen several 'ill configured' servers that try to pull the same sa-update every 5 mins forever.

I had our night shift guys track down and send the admins a friendly note, mentioning that they aren't getting the updates anyway, so why not fix it?

No response, no change in activity (note: this might be due to one of the distro's not being able to store and check pgp keys if they are in the /tmp directory, a proposed SA bugzilla starts to address this, but these queries are for older versions of SA) And/or full /tmp filesystems, etc. We never did figure it out, but if anyone wants a list of the top 10 ip's, they can email me offlist.

Now, I disagree TOTALLY on setting the 'abuser's dns queries to return FP on DNSWL_HIGH, this serves no purpose. Blocking the ip address by firewall will save bandwidth and cpu cycles. returning FP on HIGH won't ever get google's attention, will it? and you still get the bandwidth and cpu cycles from the largest abusers.


Regards,
KAM


--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

   * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
   * Best Intrusion Prevention Product
   * Hot Company Finalist 2011
   * Best Email Security Product
   * Certified SNORT Integrator

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com/ ______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to