On 12/21, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
But your question may actually be a very good one, which might, in the
end, come down to: Why isn't RP_MATCHES_RCVD flagged as mutable and
having optimal scores generated based on masscheck data?
On 21.12.11 13:37, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I take that back, I think all the scores in 72_scores.cf are mutable /
subject to regular optimal re-scoring. So the answer is some combination
of:
1) Because you don't contribute data via masscheck, so we don't have the
benefit of your data to improve the usefulness of scores.
should we contribute spam that hits RP_MATCHES_RCVD ? :)
(unluckily, not mentioning mailing lists, I'm not getting much of mail)
2) Because the re-scorer thinks this rule is useful enough in blocking
spams that it's worth the occasional missed spam it causes. Would you
rather get as many spams as you do, and have them all hit
RP_MATCHES_RCVD, or not use RP_MATCHES_RCVD, and miss twice as many
spams? "Twice" is not intended to be a solid number, just an example of
how the re-scorer might be thinking. Since it always aims for 1
wrong non-spam in 2500, so what varies by rule usage is the number
of spams it catches.
Actually, it has negative score, so the rule unblocks ham... and causes
FNs.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.
