On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, spamassas...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
On 23/12/11 14:25, David F. Skoll wrote:
The only downside to CDB is that incremental updates are not possible.
To train, you need to rebuild the entire CDB file. For us, that's
an acceptable tradeoff, but YMMV.
Another major downside to this approach compared to using MySQL, is that
it doesn't allow you to access the same bayes db from multiple machines
at the same time. Unless I'm mistaken..?
Each machine would have its own copy of the latest database.
Learning would be to a master that is not being read, and that master
would be periodically distributed to SA hosts.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never
does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here."
-- Peter da Silva in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 days until Christmas
