On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the documentation
I think that the problem
was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the first week the system
starts to work. The initial
thresold for Ham was -0.001 and I think that this thresold causes a
lot of spam and backscatter addresses
was learned as non-spam addresses. Could be possible?
and, this is one reason why awl is deprecated, and disabled by default
in all new SA installations for (2 years? someone correct me on the time?)
Q: if you did not have that negative score, would you have marked those
emails as spam? if answer is yes, disable AWL.
also, since you are using amavisd-new, you might want to ask specific
(non AWL) questions on their mailing list about backscatter. they have
a solution that might work better than AWL.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNORT Integrator
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com/
______________________________________________________________________
