Oh, thank you! I though that restarting spamd was sufficient. 2012/2/22 Duane Hill <[email protected]>
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 13:04:31 UTC, > [email protected]: > > > I have tried in two ways: > > > 1) commenting out AWL loadplugin line in v310.pre, restarting spamd. > Amavis > > log is showing that AWL rules are still triggered. > > 2) commenting out AWL loadplugin line in v310.pre, and including > > "use_auto_whitelist 0" in local.cf. > > spamassassin --lint produces an error. > > 3) Enabling loadplugin line in v310.pre and including "use_auto_whitelist > > 0". Same result, AWL rules are still triggered. > > > Maybe Maia config is overriding this setting? > > > Thank you! > > I forgot you are using amavisd. Amavisd doesn't use SA's spamd. You > have to restart amavisd whenever you make changes. > > > 2012/2/22 Duane Hill <[email protected]> > > >> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 12:36:31 UTC, > [email protected]: > >> > >> > Now, Im very confused. I have configured to NOT Use AWL. > >> > >> > # Auto-Whitelist configuration > >> > # Deshabilitar Auto-whitelist > >> > use_auto_whitelist 0 > >> > >> > in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > >> > >> > I have checked with spamassassin --lint the config and restart spamd. > >> > >> > I am still seeing AWL triggered on the amavis log: > >> > >> > Feb 22 13:35:20 xxx.yyy.zzz /usr/sbin/amavisd[5555]: (05555-07) > >> spam_scan: > >> > hits=-2.045 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8,*AWL=-0.247* > >> > ,BAYES_50=0.001,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 > >> > >> > :?????????????????????????? > >> > >> Did you disable (comment out) the AWL line in the config file > >> v310.pre? > >> > >> > 2012/2/21 Duane Hill <[email protected]> > >> > >> >> On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 15:18:30 UTC, > >> >> [email protected] confabulated: > >> >> > >> >> > On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote: > >> >> >> rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the > >> documentation > >> >> >> I think that the problem > >> >> >> was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the first week the system > >> >> >> starts to work. The initial > >> >> >> thresold for Ham was -0.001 and I think that this thresold causes > a > >> >> >> lot of spam and backscatter addresses > >> >> >> was learned as non-spam addresses. Could be possible? > >> >> >> > >> >> > and, this is one reason why awl is deprecated, and disabled by > default > >> >> > in all new SA installations for (2 years? someone correct me on the > >> >> time?) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html > >> >> ... > >> >> use_auto_whitelist ( 0 | 1 ) (default: 1) > >> >> > >> >> Does that mean docs haven't changed to reflect yet? > >> >> > >> >> > Q: if you did not have that negative score, would you have marked > >> those > >> >> > emails as spam? if answer is yes, disable AWL. > >> >> > >> >> > also, since you are using amavisd-new, you might want to ask > specific > >> >> > (non AWL) questions on their mailing list about backscatter. they > >> have > >> >> > a solution that might work better than AWL. > > -- > If at first you don't succeed... > ...so much for skydiving. > > -- -- Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral <[email protected]>
