Hello Bowie Bailey, Am 2012-02-24 12:42:02, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > Why not? It doesn't have to be specific. "public41.tamay-dogan.net" > would work fine. What is the downside of having a rDNS entry?
...because my ISP @office (Alice) offer only fixed IP (85.182.220.41)
with only but no rDNS, exactly, I have only
e182220041.adsl.alicedsl.de.
which interferer with my network.
> Why are they rejected? Do you have any bounces with specific information?
My mail server <mail.tamay-dogan.net> send me an error message back,
that the receiving MTA can not resolv <work1.intranet.tamay-dogan.net>
which is the first Received: header.
> > Is there a was to solv this?
> That would depend entirely on what the actual problem is.
The question is: WHY does the receiving MTA check the sending computer?
Probably it will be in nearly all enterprises on a private IP range and
not equiped with a public IP.
> > Note: I see, not all spamassassin setups rejecting my mails including
> > my own one if it receive mails from others and same setup.
>
> I'm not sure I understand this statement. Are you saying your SA server
> has the same behavior you are complaining about or not?
Some years ago it had, but since the upgrade to Debian/Lenny, the
problem was gone silently. It was only a dist-upgrade and nothing has
changed in the configuration, exept a new version of spamassassin
> Most tests in SA should not look beyond the first untrusted server.
> That would be mail.tamay-dogan.net in the case of your outgoing mail.
> Anything prior to that should be irrelevant -- particularly if they have
> private IP addresses.
This is, why I am puzzeling arround. I like to find out, which part of
spamassassin trigger this error.
I get the same error, if I send E-Mails using my <freenet.de> account,
exactly, I add an esmtproute to copurier-mta which use <mail.freenet.de>
as authenticated SMTP relay and use my email <linux4michelleOfreenet.de>
and normaly it just work, but the MTAs rejecting my own mails, reject
even the freenet mails.
So, the error is not on my end, but on the receiving MTA which make it
very hard to debug things.
I have already send those enterprises mails from my squirrelmail
interface and was nicely received by the offending MTA... unfortunately
the admins of the Mailsystems have absolutely no clue! They are even to
sick to check there mail logs (IF they exist)
> Bowie
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
Internet Service Provider, Cloud Computing
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/>
itsystems@tdnet Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
Owner Michelle Konzack
Gewerbe Strasse 3 Tel office: +49-176-86004575
77694 Kehl Tel mobil: +49-177-9351947
Germany Tel mobil: +33-6-61925193 (France)
USt-ID: DE 278 049 239
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
