LuKreme wrote: > On 04 Mar 2012, at 03:55 , xTrade Assessory wrote: > >> what do you think of something less complex? > Yeah, I went with Junk/NotJunk, anything placed in Junk gets trained as spam, > anything in NotJunk trained as ham. What I’d like to do though is move the > messages that are in NotJunk to the inbox maildir as they are processed. > > Possible? >
everything is possible :) question is if necessary ... if you have bayes already active as well as autolearn then why should you run all this again, still more since manual work may not be accurate. or do you read all this msgs to be sure they are ham/spam? I understand that the sa-learn should be used only for content you are sure to be ham/spam what is difficult, unless you trust yourself and use it only on your mailbox :) I use it because sometimes you get commercial messages which technically are not spam, have even correct auth headers and everything but it is SPAM because I do not want to receive every day some kind of offer, so this ones I can pipe into sa-learn so they bounce into the spam folder next time they come ... but that is only my opinion Hans -- XTrade Assessory International Facilitator BR - US - CA - DE - GB - RU - UK +55 (11) 4249.2222 http://xtrade.matik.com.br
