On Mon, May 28, 2012 00:09, Matthias Leisi wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Wolfgang Zeikat > <wolfgang.zei...@desy.de> wrote: >> In an older episode, on 2012-05-26 22:06, Jeremy Morton wrote: >>> >>> OK I continue to get this problem - lots of spam is coming through now >>> with: >>> -4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, >>> medium >>> trust >> >> >> We had so many false positives with that rule, that I - as others who >> replied to your post already (see below) - have come to the conclusion >> that > > Care to share with dnswl.org (which I represent) or the list here what > "false positives" you got? > > In most cases, "so many" false positives are more a question of > setting up the trust path in SpamAssassin correctly. If it is some > error in our data, we'd like to know (and correct). > > Thanks, > -- Matthias, for dnswl.org >
Personally I'm quite happy with dnswl.org. I have 0 spam with this rule triggered in my corpus (which can be seen in http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org) Great service.
