On 07/12/2012 09:01 AM, David F. Skoll wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:50:59 +0200 > Robert Schetterer <rob...@schetterer.org> wrote: > >> spf does not solve spam problems in general, its may only one from >> many parameters for spam tagging check > Indeed. I *never* subtract points for an SPF "pass" except for a very > few select domains that I trust. I only ever use SPF to add points in > the case of fail or softfail (and "neutral" for certain domains like > adp.com.) Would you suggest/recommend using spf-bayes? [auto-learning of "worth" of given domain SPF record]
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with &... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all&qu... Daniel McDonald
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all&qu... Josef Karliak
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+al... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all" darxus
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all&qu... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+al... John Hardin
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all" Benny Pedersen
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all" Robert Schetterer
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all&qu... David F. Skoll
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+al... Andrzej A. Filip
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "... David F. Skoll
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with &... Martin Gregorie
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with &... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "... Robert Schetterer
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all&qu... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Spamassassin and SPF records with "+all&qu... RW