No, I'm not meaning that. I'm instead following the Hardin suggestion, which works better with mass-check.
I'm suggesting to use CIDR::Lite to avoid being fooled by stuff like +128.0.0.0/1 +0.0.0.0/1... Giampaolo Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> ha scritto: Den 2012-07-13 19:44, Giampaolo Tomassoni skrev: > Our hypothetic plugin could merge together CIDRs via > Net::CIDR::Lite->add() > and get the resultant merged, non-overlapping CIDRs via ->list(), > then count > the size of the allowed addresses (via something like 2^(32 - > cidr_prefix)) > and fire rules like the ones you suggest. so it fire if more then one ip is in spf ?, lets say more points if more ips ?
