On 10/31, jdow wrote: > On 2012/10/31 14:05, John Hardin wrote: > >On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > > >>> Shouldn't it be set via GA in 72_scores.cf ? > >> > >>Doesn't sound like a bad idea to comment it in 50_scores.cf and let it > >>float. > > > >+1. That's what threw me when I did my quickie analysis early on. > > ReeeeaaallY? Would it not be better to put in a line like this? > score HK_LOTTO 0 > > 50_scores.cf would be continually getting overwritten by updates, would > it not?
They're talking about automated score generation. Currently, apparently, the scores for this rule are fixed, and not included in the calculation of ideal scores. They're talking about including it in the calculation of ideal scores. Which you download the results of from sa-update. They're not talking about local score modification. -- "Eh, wisdom's overrated. I prefer beatings and snacks." - Unity, Skin Horse http://www.ChaosReigns.com
