On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Alex wrote:
So far working good. Caught 4620 spams since sunday morning with these mixed
case rules.
Can you really make scoring decisions based on a mixed-case URI? Do
you have it as part of a meta with the other rules that John provided?
I'm looking at John's sandbox entries, and wondering if there is a
rule to be made from those URIs he's created, or are you just probing
to see if they are tagged at this point?
At the moment the rules should just be exploratory. The masscheck shows
_very_ weak S/O and disproportionate FPs; I am tuning them but at the
moment they don't look too good. I'd put effort into figuring out likely
metas, but they are barely hitting any spam in the masscheck corpora.
Marc, do you have any stats on how much of your _ham_ those rules are
hitting?
And it would be helpful if you could contribute masscheck results since
you seem to be seeing a lot more of these than any other contributors.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are my space habitats? Where is my flying car?
It's 2010 and all I got from the SF books of my youth
is the lousy dystopian government. -- perlhaqr
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
166 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
