I don't think that should cause triggering RCVD_IN_PBL. On 11/17, Frederic De Mees wrote: > There is one line missing in the following path: > ========================= > Received: from mx.mg2.unifiedemail.net ([10.251.10.236]) by > corpserv1.corp.unifiedemail.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); > Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:20:32 -0500 > Received: from ([127.0.0.1]) with MailEnable ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 > 22:20:28 -0500 > Received: from hppro (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr [94.68.74.194]) > by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) > id 0LhkkD-1Svsfh1rOL-00mkUj; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 04:20:25 +0100 > ========================= > A no time the message shows that Unifiedmail has received it from > kundenserver. > > Have you submitted your sample to Unifiedemail via the webform, or > via e-mail ? > > Frédéric > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "umeca74" <umec...@hotmail.com> > To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org> > Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 5:00 PM > Subject: Re: wrong RCVD_IN_PBL? > > > >>Your IP (ppp-94-68-74-194.home.otenet.gr is: 94.68.74.194) looks like > >>a dynamic home user subscriber line (adsl, cable, dialup). > > > >that's correct > > > >>PBL contains ranges of IP addresses that should never send e-mail > >>directly to other domains. > > > >that's what I'm saying, I am NOT sending emails directly from this IP, the > >SMTP server is located in germany (1and1.co.uk) and I am connecting to it > >using an encrypted authorized connection. That's why I think there is a > >problem with spam assassin's RCVD_IN_PBL report! > > > > > > > >-- > >View this message in context: > >http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/wrong-RCVD-IN-PBL-tp102334p102340.html > >Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
-- "No human thing is of serious importance." - Plato http://www.ChaosReigns.com
