On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:45:02 -0800 Glenn Park wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:02 PM, RW <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:03:33 -0800 > > Glenn Park wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm new to Debian and am trying to understand the Right way to > >> configure the standard (aptitude-installed) spamassassin package to > >> use tmpfs shared memory for its temporary directory. > >>
> > I don't think it's used for much apart from pyzor and the non-daemon > > version of DCC. > > Oh really? Is the advice that you find around claiming performance > improvements by situating SpamAssassin on tmpfs wrong? Outdated? I've never seen any such claims for spamd. It may be true for other software that uses the SpamAssassin libraries, Amavisd etc, which I don't really follow.
