On 12/16/2012 8:43 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:25:44 +0100
Axb wrote:
On 12/15/2012 06:12 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice?
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE <--- see, twice on
If rule doesn't have a description, rulename becomes the description
Personally, I'd rather it were just left blank or replaced with a
standard string.
I find it makes it harder to notice a rule in the status report.
I'd rather the rule have a description but I agree, a "no further
description available" seems better. Can you open a bug report?
