On 2/7/2013 11:13 AM, Marc Perkel wrote: > > On 2/7/2013 6:58 AM, RW wrote: >> On Tue, 05 Feb 2013 07:20:24 -0800 >> Marc Perkel wrote: >> >>> is there a way I can put something in a rule that would cause bayes >>> not to learn - such as a rule that detects bayes poisoning? >> Why do you think this is a good idea? >> >> > Because when a message uses invisible text to poison bayes then I don't > want to learn that because it will make bayes less effective. >
Invisible text is a problem only for humans, not for machines. So, it sounds as though the problem you're describing relates to reviewing messages, manually (with your eyes), and taking some action as a result. If this is so, why not read the messages in *plaintext*, so you see the "invisible text" and can therefore act accordingly?
