On 2/13/2013 11:03 PM, Anirudha Patil wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Mark Martinec <mark.martinec...@ijs.si <mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si>> wrote:

    Anirudha,

    > I have a stable running setup of postfix after-queue using
    amavis-new
    > [currently using for content inspection and antivirus only] and
    would like
    > to use this for additional spam protection.
    >
    > As i understand from the above comments to my query, i dont need
    to run the
    > 'spamd' as separate process, but would invoke the spamprotection via
    > amavis-new [via spamassasin perl moduled].

    Exactly.

    > I would continue to install the latest version of spamassasin
    with existing
    > amavis-new and check if the same error is encountered.

    Right.


Thank you Mark and Bailey,
I have upgraded the spamassasin to 3.3.2, now i dont see the initial error message and can see that amavis is invoking the multiple rulesets of SA and also the corresponding scores are set for emails.

Does SA increases the load on the system ? Are they any tweaking guides to enable only specific rules in SA and not all?

The main thing to watch for with SA is memory usage. Each Amavis process will load up all of the SA rules, so they can use a fair chunk of RAM. Make sure to tweak the max number of processes in the Amavis config so that you don't go into swap when the system gets busy.

SA is already tuned as much as possible for general use. Unless you have specific problems, it is not usually a good idea to disable any of the default rules. Most of the "tweaks" you will find for SA involve loading extra rules. This causes SA to use more resources, but it can increase the accuracy.

http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy

--
Bowie

Reply via email to