On 4/19/2013 at 6:29 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
that is what you should do. You need to train on both spam and ham, since
the BAYES filter must know how they differ...
On 19.04.13 07:02, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
That has always given me pause, as I get very little ham. Got one this AM.
which I will feed
but that's the first in at least a month.
I gather that aged info is not useful?
I think that could be useful, mostly when it's aged HAM, but even aged spam
is better than no spam...
Training missed spam is more important but even training catched spam helps
In your case (just a few ham) I'd train _all_ ham and all spam that does not
hit BAYES_99
I looked at my spam history - only ~10% of my spam does not hit BAYES_99
and last spam hitting BAYES_50 was about a year and 500 spams ago.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released
in first quarter of year 1901
