Re: New rule for HTML spam, using comments?

[cepheid]

Hi John,

See the following example:
http://pastebin.com/DAYJ7NnJ

Lots of style gibberish for sure, but it failed to hit your rule 
(sa-update ran at 4am today so it should have picked up anything 
published).  I'm guessing it's the parentheses.

Whack the mole! =)

                                                --- Amir

p.s. On the upside, at least it hit bayes99! ;-)