On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 23:46 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> Doesn't seem to be hard to write afresh. Glimpse at the full headers,
> identify From: thingies, count 'em, and ding the bell if there's more
> than one...
>
> header __HAS_FROM ALL =~ /^From:\s/m
> tflags __HAS_FROM multiple
>
> meta MULTI_FROM __FROM > 1
^^^^^^
Ahem. That should have been __HAS_FROM.
Also, these short and generic rule names like __HAS_FROM are prone to
eventually stomp on a canonical 'header __HAS_FROM exists:From', like
similar already existing ones. I suggest renaming the rules with some
local id.
> Oh, BTW -- untested. :)
Which I just proved...
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
