On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:06 -0600, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote: > At 5:48 PM +0200 07/29/2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > See the Content-Type and Content-Transfer-Encoding headers. > > There were none for this email. Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > The complete "raw source" (identical to what's actually in the mbox) is > available here: http://pastebin.com/GsRsYzMD (I've blanked out > personally-identifying information, so the message ID has been > modified for this paste, but obviously not in the original email). > > I'm suspecting that it's the "undisclosed recipients" in the To: field > that may be causing confusion with Bayes... I think the MUA inserted > that, but not entirely positive. Possible indeed, and even likely, given it's position after any other original header. The Status header is added by your MUA (and ignored by Bayes). Tried --forget without the To header? -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
