On 14/08/2013 16:02, Nigel Smith wrote:

> I wonder whether you should have chosen an RFC5737 address rather than an RFC1918 address for your obfuscation purposes...
Because I forgot about RFC5737.  ;-(
As I said, happy to give full un-munged headers off-list.

It's OK, I was just trying to be funny.:-)

--
Regards,

Giles Coochey, CCNP, CCNA, CCNAS
NetSecSpec Ltd
+44 (0) 8444 780677
+44 (0) 7983 877438
http://www.coochey.net
http://www.netsecspec.co.uk
gi...@coochey.net

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to