On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 13:22 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > Following some prior to SpamAssassin update these messages now appear in the > maillog file:
The SA version you updated to (and from) would have been useful. Well, given the warnings, it appears to be 3.3.x now. > Sep 19 12:37:11.053 [27093] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.1/32 as it > has already been included See the M::SA::Conf [1] docs, trusted_network option. 127/8 and ::1 are always included in internal_networks, regardless of config. To get rid of that warning just drop the conf line adding 127.0.0.1 to your internal_networks. > Sep 19 12:37:11.056 [27093] info: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in > "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": auto_whitelist_factor 1 The AWL plugin is disabled by default since 3.3. That option is only valid, if the AWL plugin is loaded. Add the following option to a custom local.pre file, if you want to continue use the AWL score averager: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL (Frankly, I believe you really should have been able to figure that one out yourself. The default value is 0.5 and that is a rather unusual option to be changed without in-depth knowledge of AWL.) > Sep 19 12:37:11.056 [27093] info: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in > "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": num_check_received 10 Wow, that's *ancient*, deprecated since 2.60-ish. Just drop that option. You mentioned seeing these warnings and info in maillog. That's a pretty suboptimal place to discover these. Running a lint check (verifying your configuration) you will see the same warnings. spamassassin --lint It is strongly suggested to *always* lint check after any configuration changes, let alone version upgrades. An additional benefit of --lint is, you can run it before starting the system-wide daemon... [1] http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
