On 10/23/2013 11:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Axb wrote:
On 10/23/2013 11:23 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Still the spam score seems a bit low, I guess I may want to tweak the
URIBL_DBL_SPAM and URIBL_BLOCKED scores.
URIBL_BLOCKED is not good news .-)
I wouldn't touch that score...
Maybe we need to rename that to URIBL_QUERY_BLOCKED for clarity?
We have:
describe URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL
was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists\#dnsbl-block for more
information.
If ppl setup their reports not to show rule descriptions.... do we need
to read them every description out loud?
