On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 03:33 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Saturday, November 09 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> > You don't have any kind of archive of spam? If so, train on recent ones,
> > feel free to exceed the minimum limit, but don't bother too much with
> > old spam. It changes much faster over time than ham does.
> >
> > Also, at least until you reached the minimum required training, do train
> > with identified spam, too. Same with ham. For now, keep training in a
> > ratio somewhere between 1:1 or spam to ham ratio.
>
> [Note: By ham I assume you mean false-positives, and not just regular
> e-mail.]
You're assuming wrong.
Ham is good mail, messages you want (or actually subscribed to),
messages sent to you with your consent. Spam is junk, unsolicited mail
sent to you without your consent. Regardless of SA classification or
score.
False positives and negatives are messages mis-classified by SA.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
