So I got it working and it appears actually reject the email versus
simply discard it. Is this ok to do? As long as its not creating spam,
it seems ok.
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
mcha...@example.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
for the recipient domain example.com by mx3.example.com.
[192.241.xxx.xxx].
The error that the other server returned was:
550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin
On 2014-01-06 09:36, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 06.01.2014 16:17, schrieb Mark Chaney:
Thanks, I will look into it, but on just a quick look, isn't it geared
more towards sendmail than postfix, which is what I am using? Also, it
doesn't appear to have been updated in a couple years and the last
update in 2011 was a security patch to a pretty big exploit. =/
spamass-milter works fine with postfix
exploit is fixed ,and wasnt ever relevant on good configured
postfix servers, there is simply nothing to do making it better so no
updates are needed
On 2014-01-06 09:07, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 06.01.2014 16:02, schrieb Mark Chaney:
I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but
when
simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay
server
and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is there still a
way
to discard high scoring spam (lets say 25), yet still marking emails
with scores of 5 or more as spam? I know how this would work with
amavis
or mailscanner, but not sure how to do it standalone with
postfix/SA. I
am hoping to avoid having to create filters at the destination
servers
and having them deleted there. Seems like needless traffic/resource
usage. Thoughts?
Thanks,
Mark
i.e use spamass milter with spamassassin
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/
-r nn Reject scanned email if it greater than or equal to nn.
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
