Hi,

I have a (what I think) false positive that I do not understand:


-------8<-----
Received: from mailgate2.x.de (x.110.60.14) by
 jencas01.ad.x.net (10.0.87.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
 14.2.342.3; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:13:43 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at x.de
Authentication-Results: mailgate2.x.de (amavisd-new);
        dkim=pass (512-bit key) header.d=x.com
Received: from mail01.www3.x.com (mail01.www3.x.com
 [x.92.26.27])        by mailgate2.x.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id
 s0UBDWqT022709 for <u...@x.de>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:13:38
 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=x.com; s=dk; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        q=dns/txt; i=@x.com; t=1391080413;
        h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
        bh=e0jQcaiGlmZP8ngYGXFSdyELyIg=;
b=AsXMY19ptAafEYi20EZ4TGoJhay16Qx3P65hMGayWeHkYb0wE37s1nNn0m56toXJ
        BVNXiabpHlOC4WgNqjuJ7g==;
Received: from [10.4.1.10] ([10.4.1.10:40171] helo=P01INJECT003) by
 msm-mta05-tor6 (envelope-from <bou...@www3.x.com>)     (ecelerity
3.5.4.38585 r(Platform:3.5.4.0)) with ESMTP id 4A/0B-14355-DD33AE25; Thu, 30
 Jan 2014 06:13:33 -0500
Message-ID: <3a0744c8c7ab4ec4a94784191fa6fafd@934049246>
X-Binding: 934049246
X-elqPod: 0x04D4AA276AEFAC548AF4C2541180280C6E4E16410A533B620AAC2EC8FC2601D8
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: x <supp...@x.com>
To: <x...@x.de>
Reply-To: x <cont...@x.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 06:13:33 -0500
Subject: x
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--boundary_1217521_36155986-9bd3-47e9-897e-0c5c68239841" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=100.0 tests=BAYES_60,DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS
        autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
        mailgate2.x.de
Return-Path: bou...@www3.x.com
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: JENCAS01.ad.x.net
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
-------8<-----

As far as I can see, all times are within a couple of seconds - so my question is: why SA adds DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q?

Thank you for your time,

Rainer

Reply via email to