On 6/4/2014 11:04 AM, Daniele Paoni wrote:
I will try to retrain my bayes database.
... and run sa-update and reload your spamd.
If you keep some of your spam and ham samples, re-train them properly.
Those that misfired are more important.
On 04.06.14 11:56, Bowie Bailey wrote:
That message would have been blocked before it even got to my spam
folder.
Daniele was apparently the early recipient.
* 4.1 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
you have increased your BAYES_99 score :-)
* 3.1 TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT To: misformatted and supposed
Microsoft tool
TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT is the only major rule I didn't see hit in your
message. I can't tell which version of SA you have, but you should
also make sure you are up to date (3.4.0) and run sa-update to make
sure you have all of the latest rules.
I see this rule in 3.3.2 (I use Debian's spamassassin so I have 3.3.2 for
now).
Seems the only problems Daniele could solve are obsolete rules and
mistrained BAYES database.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase, (D)elete
