On Jun 25, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/25/2014 10:21 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > >> http://pastebin.com/qLyKx40b > > "This paste has been removed!" :(
I’ve temporarily posted it on ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/harp.eml > >> Here’s what I’m showing it matched: >> >> Jun 25 11:16:07 mail mimedefang.pl[18682]: s5PHFqsC019802: >> s5PHFqsC019802: 4.889 (****) >> BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VERIFIED,HTML_MESSAGE,L_BLOCK_ISP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD >> >> Odd that it didn’t match MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY or >> CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER or any rules about excessive redundant >> encoding. > > FARAWAY will only match if you enabled > ok_locales en > or some other country - not always reliable > > interesting that you got a BAYES_00 - meaning your Bayes may need more > learning/ auto learning I don’t think I’ve enabled learning. > >> Would it be a lot of work to the number of ETH (D w/ STROKE, >> whatever) followed by 3/4 character pairs? >> >> Here’s the other thing I don’t get. >> >> The message claims to be 7-bit and text/plain, yet it uses encoded >> characters which exceed 7-bit widths yet this doesn’t seem to be >> firing any rules either. >> >> Ь would seem to be at least an 11-bit wide character. >> >> Are we being “too liberal in what we accept”? > > or trying to be too restrictive? ESPish sort of mail can contain often > contain such wonderful combinations. The travel business senders are experts > in producing the wildest of mixes. > > ESPish? That’s a sports channel, right?
