On 07/02/2014 05:39 PM, Steve Bergman wrote:
On 07/02/2014 09:48 AM, Axb wrote:
If an IP is exploited/sends spam and a legitimate msg is rejected then
somebody hasn't done due diligence and I see the reject as legitimated.
The legitimate senders and receivers of the good message, neither of
whom's companies have anything to do with the spam, would not see it
that way. And I agree with their perspective. Some of the perspective
I'm reading here seem really off in the ether. I get the impression that
some are so frustrated with SA's limitations that they are willing to
resort to desperate measures which normal users would instantly
recognize as insane.
No rudeness intended. But some of the things I'm reading here are just
bizarre.
I suggest you join the SDLU list where you can discuss anti spam
philosophy.
It's a great resource for knowledge.
List Guidelines: http://www.new-spam-l.com/admin/faq.html
List Information: https://spammers.dontlike.us/mailman/listinfo/list
The Mailop list is also a good place to lurk and bathe in hundreds of
years of mail related experience
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
