On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 13:39 -0300, Andre Luiz Paiz wrote:
> Quoting Adi <adi...@gmail.com>:
> > W dniu 2014-07-25 14:07, Andre Luiz Paiz pisze:
> > > I received a SPAM that Spamassassing gave a high negative score
> > > (-86.0) to a e-mail message. I believe that is because the spammer
> >
> > Maybe you get -100 for whitelist ?
> >
> > Please check (or pastebin) mail headers (X-Spam*) or look in
> > logs (maillog or your MTA logs)
Excerpt from the terribly formatted single-line paste:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-89.017 tagged_above=-999 required=6
> tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DSPAM_SPAM=8.5, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML=0.021,
> HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.629,
> SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING=0.049, SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS=1.518,
> USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> There is no whitelist setting for @localhost, unless this is a default
> setting. There is a whitelist entry for the mail server, but for the
> FQDN.
Yes, you do have a bad whitelist option set in your configuration. And
no, that is not default.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
