On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 14:11 -0700, Robert Grimes wrote: > Both spamc and hMailServer SA service are running in the same directory > where the binaries for SA are. I am not sure the significance of the > directory name. As I stated both use the same parameters which is only -l > therefore SA uses default config file locations for both.
Earlier in this thread you mentioned using the -l option with spamd. Now you mention using that option with "both". So, by "hMailServer SA service", are you referring to spamd? In either case, your assumption of using identical command line options resulting in spamd and spamc using the same configuration is false. * For spamc, the -l option sends log messages to stderr instead of syslog. Given you're running Windows, I don't even know if that option has any effect at all. * For spamd, the -l option enables telling, that is allowing learning (Bayes) and reporting spam to external services via spamc. The latter is a rather uncommon option, and even less likely to be used deliberately in the environment of a new SA user. For spamc/d options and a lot more details, see the documentation. In particular the docs named after their respective programs and the Conf one. http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc/ > I have had serveral hundred hams. Wouldn't that be enough? Yes, as Martin mentioned, learning 200 spam and ham each is sufficient for Bayes to start working. But see my other reply to this thread in a few. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
