On 8/15/2014 11:45 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 15.08.2014 um 18:33 schrieb Noel:
>> On 8/15/2014 10:27 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> Am 15.08.2014 um 16:26 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
>>>> On 8/15/2014 2:30 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>>> Question: Would it make sense to have rules based on dnssec / dane
>>>>> records exist for a maildomain ?
>>>>>
>>>> A) rules have to be used for things that indicate ham or spaminess
>>>> B) you can only automate something you have done manually
>>>>
>>>> So have you looked at this anecdotally and believe there is an
>>>> indication of ham/spaminess from checking these records?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> KAM
>>> It was just question, i have no preference to this yet,
>>>
>>> perhaps thinkable:
>>>
>>> tag domains with dane smtp record for hamness, cause its not wide
>>> provided yet and  identify it as advanced tec skill which results in
>>> rare send spam too
>>>
>> I think detecting dane smtp is a good thing as it gives another
>> metric to test on.
>>
>> I don't think it says anything directly about ham/spam, but may be
>> useful in macros.
>>
>> DKIM/SPF was widely adopted by spammers fairly early after portions
>> of the tech community talked about whitelisting authenticated mail. 
>> You might remember one early point when a significant portion of the
>> early-adopters were spammers and legit sites hadn't caught up yet.
>>
>> The same will happen with dane as usage expands -- some clever
>> spam-support tech will develop a tool to easily mass-configure dane
>> for throwaway domains.  
> Good point , seems comparable
>
> are there any stats how much spam is send with right/exist
> SPF/DMARC/DKIM (TLS)
>
> guess its mostly from hacked accounts at big mail providers, are there
> any other big sources for such spam mails ?


I was mostly thinking about the sophisticated "snowshoe" spammers
that create large numbers of throwaway domains, all fully RFC
compliant.  They were early adopters of DKIM/SPF.  I'm sure they'll
adopt dane as soon as it looks worth their time.

And yes, hacked accounts will continue to be a problem too.



  -- Noel Jones

Reply via email to